
Democratic · Incumbent
Recognizing the month of October 2026 as Filipino American History Month and celebrating the history and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense contributions to the United States.
Oct 2026
Expressing support for the recognition of the month of October 2025 as Filipino American History Month and celebrating the history and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense contributions to the United States.
Oct 2025
Mental Health Services for Students Act of 2025
Oct 2025
Stop Mental Health Stigma in Our Communities Act of 2025
May 2025
Empowering and Enforcing Environmental Justice Act of 2025
Mar 2025

Democratic · Incumbent
Recognizing the month of October 2026 as Filipino American History Month and celebrating the history and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense contributions to the United States.
Oct 2026
Expressing support for the recognition of the month of October 2025 as Filipino American History Month and celebrating the history and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense contributions to the United States.
Oct 2025
Mental Health Services for Students Act of 2025
Oct 2025
Stop Mental Health Stigma in Our Communities Act of 2025
May 2025
Empowering and Enforcing Environmental Justice Act of 2025
Mar 2025
Opportunity To Address College Hunger Act
Jun 2025
Showing 20 of 617 bills
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments
On Passage
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Passage
On Passage
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
2 votes · 0 yea · 2 nay
On Ordering the Previous Question
On Passage
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Agreeing to the Resolution
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Table
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Passage
Showing 20 of 641 votes
On the ballot · 2026
Key dates
Full two-year term
No positions on record yet
Constituents can ask the campaign to take a public stance on the issues that matter to them.
Opportunity To Address College Hunger Act
Jun 2025
Showing 20 of 617 bills
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments
On Passage
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Passage
On Passage
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
2 votes · 0 yea · 2 nay
On Ordering the Previous Question
On Passage
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Agreeing to the Resolution
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Table
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
On Passage
Showing 20 of 641 votes
On the ballot · 2026
Key dates
Full two-year term
No positions on record yet
Constituents can ask the campaign to take a public stance on the issues that matter to them.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
On Agreeing to the Resolution
The government holds the investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking of children: who paid, who flew, who knew, and which prosecutors decided back in 2008 that a plea deal was enough. Every release so far has landed late, partial, and with the redactions falling in suspiciously convenient places. The survivors have spent two decades being told to wait while the people they named kept their board seats and their reputations. There is exactly one legitimate reason to withhold any of this, and that is protecting victims who never chose to be in it; every other black box is someone being shielded who shouldn't be. Force the full release of the Epstein files with victim-identifying information redacted and nothing else, and open an independent review of how the 2008 deal was allowed to happen.
Stop warrantless government surveillance of Americans and reform Section 702 and FISA to require a warrant. The government should not get a back door into your calls, emails, and location without a judge's sign-off, no matter who is in power.
When an AI system a company sold gives dangerous advice, invents a defamatory "fact" about a real person, or hands an attacker the keys to the system it was trusted with, the company's answer is a terms-of-service page you clicked past and a claim that nobody could have seen it coming. Every other industry that ships a product into people's lives (cars, drugs, ladders, baby formula) answers for foreseeable harm in a courtroom. That isn't hostility to the technology; it's the ordinary price of selling something, and it's the only mechanism that has ever reliably gotten a company to fix a defect before the lawsuit instead of after. Pass a federal AI liability standard: no blanket immunity, no forced arbitration, and a clear path to court when a company's system causes real harm.
The government holds the investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking of children: who paid, who flew, who knew, and which prosecutors decided back in 2008 that a plea deal was enough. Every release so far has landed late, partial, and with the redactions falling in suspiciously convenient places. The survivors have spent two decades being told to wait while the people they named kept their board seats and their reputations. There is exactly one legitimate reason to withhold any of this, and that is protecting victims who never chose to be in it; every other black box is someone being shielded who shouldn't be. Force the full release of the Epstein files with victim-identifying information redacted and nothing else, and open an independent review of how the 2008 deal was allowed to happen.
Stop warrantless government surveillance of Americans and reform Section 702 and FISA to require a warrant. The government should not get a back door into your calls, emails, and location without a judge's sign-off, no matter who is in power.
When an AI system a company sold gives dangerous advice, invents a defamatory "fact" about a real person, or hands an attacker the keys to the system it was trusted with, the company's answer is a terms-of-service page you clicked past and a claim that nobody could have seen it coming. Every other industry that ships a product into people's lives (cars, drugs, ladders, baby formula) answers for foreseeable harm in a courtroom. That isn't hostility to the technology; it's the ordinary price of selling something, and it's the only mechanism that has ever reliably gotten a company to fix a defect before the lawsuit instead of after. Pass a federal AI liability standard: no blanket immunity, no forced arbitration, and a clear path to court when a company's system causes real harm.