119th Congress

H.Res.294

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Introduced·4/7/25

Prefiled

Introduced4/7/25

Chamber Passed

Final Passage

Complete

House Resolution 294 allows for consideration of joint resolutions disapproving certain rules by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and.

House Resolution 294 provides for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions" and the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications." It also provides for consideration of the bill (H.R.

Included in complete analysis

Overview
Core Provisions
Implementation
Impact
Legal Framework
Critical Issues

See what it does, who it affects, and the critical issues in plain language. Free, 30 seconds.

Where it stands

Current: In committee
Next: Committee decision

Roll Call Votes

213 Yea

R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RRR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RRR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RRR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R I R R R R R R R RRR RRR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RRR R RRR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R

211 Nay

D D D D D D D D D R D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DDD D D D D D D DDD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DDD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D

9 Absent

R D R R D D R R R

History

Apr 8, 2025

House

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)

Apr 8, 2025

House

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.

Apr 8, 2025

House

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

H.Res.294

Where it stands

Sponsors

Roll Call Votes

History