119th Congress

H.R.9705

To require the Secretary of the Army to issue guidance relating to the review of applications for alteration or temporary or permanent occupation or use of certain hydropower projects, and for other purposes.

Introduced·7/15/26

Prefiled

Introduced7/15/26

Chamber Passed

Final Passage

Complete

Introduced

H. R. 9705

Introduced in House · August 28, 2026

July 15, 2026

Ms. Goodlander (for herself and Mrs. Miller of West Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Standardized review procedures for hydropower projects.

(a) Definitions.—In this section:

completeness review.— (1) COMPLETENESS REVIEW.—The term “completeness review” means a review by the Secretary (or a designee) regarding whether a application is complete.

HR9705 U.S. House: The bill mandates the Secretary of the…

(1) MANDATORY GUIDANCE.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance establishing the following:
1. (A) APPLICATION CHECKLIST.—A standardized checklist of required materials for section 408 applications, to be developed in consultation with—
  1. (i) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
  2. (ii) the Hydroelectric Design Center of the Corps of Engineers;
  3. (iii) hydropower project operators; and
  4. (iv) relevant industry associations.
2. (B) COMPLETENESS CRITERIA.—A clear description of what constitutes a complete section 408 application, including with respect to—
  1. (i) required documents and analyses;
  2. (ii) formatting and submission requirements; and
  3. (iii) evidence of compliance with any applicable Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license.
3. (C) PHASED REVIEW PROCEDURES.—For section 408 applications for which a phased design review is required—
  1. (i) the specific scope and objectives of each review phase;
  2. (ii) a timeline for each review phase;
  3. (iii) an applicable definition of the terms “fatal flaw”, “final quality assurance”, and “technical review”; and
  4. (iv) a clear statement that a completeness review shall not include—
    1. (I) detailed technical analysis; or
    2. (II) any engineering-related judgment with respect to design adequacy.
4. (D) ESCALATION PROCEDURES.—Procedures for referring a section 408 application to the head of the applicable Division Office of the Corps of Engineers or an official at the Corps of Engineers headquarters in any case in which a deadline applicable to the section 408 application is not met.
(2) SCOPE OF COMPLETENESS REVIEWS.—The guidance issued under paragraph (1) shall establish that a completeness review shall be limited to verification that—
1. (A) all required documents have been submitted;
2. (B) those documents are in the required format; and
3. (C) the section 408 application addresses the applicable requirements of the checklist under paragraph (1)(A).
(3) PROHIBITIONS.—In conducting a completeness review, the Secretary (or a designee) may not—
1. (A) conduct a detailed technical review of any engineering calculations;
2. (B) evaluate the design adequacy of, or alternative approaches to, the hydropower project that is the subject of the section 408 application;
3. (C) request any design modification to, or additional analysis of, the hydropower project that is the subject of the section 408 application;
4. (D) consider any factor other than a factor included in the standardized checklist under paragraph (1)(A); or
5. (E) require compliance with any environmental standard that was not established by a Federal or relevant State agency before the date of submission of the section 408 application.

(1) MANDATORY GUIDANCE.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance establishing the following:
1. (A) APPLICATION CHECKLIST.—A standardized checklist of required materials for section 408 applications, to be developed in consultation with—
  1. (i) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
  2. (ii) the Hydroelectric Design Center of the Corps of Engineers;
  3. (iii) hydropower project operators; and
  4. (iv) relevant industry associations.
2. (B) COMPLETENESS CRITERIA.—A clear description of what constitutes a complete section 408 application, including with respect to—
  1. (i) required documents and analyses;
  2. (ii) formatting and submission requirements; and
  3. (iii) evidence of compliance with any applicable Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license.
3. (C) PHASED REVIEW PROCEDURES.—For section 408 applications for which a phased design review is required—
  1. (i) the specific scope and objectives of each review phase;
  2. (ii) a timeline for each review phase;
  3. (iii) an applicable definition of the terms “fatal flaw”, “final quality assurance”, and “technical review”; and
  4. (iv) a clear statement that a completeness review shall not include—
    1. (I) detailed technical analysis; or
    2. (II) any engineering-related judgment with respect to design adequacy.
4. (D) ESCALATION PROCEDURES.—Procedures for referring a section 408 application to the head of the applicable Division Office of the Corps of Engineers or an official at the Corps of Engineers headquarters in any case in which a deadline applicable to the section 408 application is not met.
(2) SCOPE OF COMPLETENESS REVIEWS.—The guidance issued under paragraph (1) shall establish that a completeness review shall be limited to verification that—
1. (A) all required documents have been submitted;
2. (B) those documents are in the required format; and
3. (C) the section 408 application addresses the applicable requirements of the checklist under paragraph (1)(A).
(3) PROHIBITIONS.—In conducting a completeness review, the Secretary (or a designee) may not—
1. (A) conduct a detailed technical review of any engineering calculations;
2. (B) evaluate the design adequacy of, or alternative approaches to, the hydropower project that is the subject of the section 408 application;
3. (C) request any design modification to, or additional analysis of, the hydropower project that is the subject of the section 408 application;
4. (D) consider any factor other than a factor included in the standardized checklist under paragraph (1)(A); or
5. (E) require compliance with any environmental standard that was not established by a Federal or relevant State agency before the date of submission of the section 408 application.