H.Con.Res.85

Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act on April 13, 2026, and recognizing its significant impact on the sustainable and profitable management of the Nation's fishery resources.

Introduced·4/16/26

Overview

This concurrent resolution commemorates the 50th anniversary of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, recognizing its transformative role in establishing a comprehensive framework for sustainable fishery management in United States waters. The resolution celebrates the Act's success in extending federal jurisdiction over fishery resources to 200 nautical miles offshore, prioritizing American fishermen's access to these resources, and creating a collaborative management system that has rebuilt dozens of fish stocks while supporting a multi-billion dollar industry. The resolution acknowledges the contributions of diverse stakeholders including fishermen, scientists, conservationists, and Indigenous and Tribal members who participate in the regional council system established by the Act. Beyond mere commemoration, the resolution affirms the ongoing importance of the Act's principles in maintaining abundant marine fish stocks that are essential to the nation's economy, food security, cultural traditions, and recreational opportunities.

Legal References

  • Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.

Core Provisions

The resolution formally recognizes the Magnuson-Stevens Act's establishment of exclusive federal control over fishery resources extending 200 nautical miles from shore, fundamentally transforming American fisheries management from its 1976 enactment. The resolution highlights the Act's creation of eight regional fishery management councils composed of diverse stakeholders including fishermen, state managers, seafood processors, conservationists, scientists, and Indigenous and Tribal members. These councils operate under national standards that mandate prevention of overfishing, establishment of annual catch limits with accountability measures, promotion of safety at sea, democratic participation in management decisions, bycatch minimization, and support for market-based management strategies. The resolution documents the Act's measurable achievements, including the rebuilding of 52 fish stocks and the reduction of overfishing to only 4 percent of managed stocks as of 2025. The resolution emphasizes that bipartisan reauthorizations have strengthened the original Act's conservation requirements while maintaining its collaborative governance structure. The concurrent resolution itself does not amend existing law or create new programs but serves as a formal congressional statement recognizing these accomplishments on the occasion of the Act's 50th anniversary in April 2026.

Key Points

  • Extension of federal fishery jurisdiction to 200 nautical miles offshore
  • Establishment of eight regional fishery management councils with diverse stakeholder representation
  • Implementation of annual catch limits and accountability measures to prevent overfishing
  • Rebuilding of 52 fish stocks through management actions
  • Reduction of overfishing to 4 percent of managed stocks by 2025
  • Creation of national standards for safety, democratic participation, and bycatch minimization

Legal References

  • Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.

Implementation

As a concurrent resolution, this measure requires no implementation machinery, funding mechanisms, or enforcement provisions. The resolution operates as a sense of Congress expression rather than binding law. The Committee on Natural Resources maintains jurisdiction over the resolution and the underlying Magnuson-Stevens Act. The resolution acknowledges the existing implementation framework under the Act itself, which operates through eight regional fishery management councils that bring together state and federal resource managers, fishermen, industry representatives, Indigenous and Tribal members, scientists, and conservationists. These councils develop fishery management plans that are implemented by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The resolution contains no reporting requirements, compliance measures, or new administrative obligations, as its purpose is commemorative and declaratory rather than operational. The existing implementation structure of the Magnuson-Stevens Act continues unchanged, with regional councils maintaining their authority to develop management plans, set catch limits, and establish conservation measures within the framework of national standards.

Impact

The resolution documents the substantial economic and social impact of the Magnuson-Stevens Act on American society, quantifying its contributions at $319 billion in sales impacts and support for 2.1 million jobs. The Act has enabled per capita consumption of 19.1 pounds of healthy, affordable seafood products annually, contributing to national food security. Direct beneficiaries include commercial and recreational fishermen who have gained priority access to fishery resources within the 200-mile exclusive economic zone, coastal communities whose economies depend on fishing industries, seafood processors and distributors, consumers who benefit from sustainable domestic seafood supplies, and Indigenous and Tribal communities whose traditional fishing practices are recognized in management decisions. The resolution identifies no cost estimates or administrative burden because it creates no new obligations or programs. Expected outcomes are purely declaratory, affirming congressional support for the Act's principles and recognizing the collaborative management approach that has achieved measurable conservation success. The resolution contains no sunset provisions and does not alter the permanent authorization of the underlying Magnuson-Stevens Act. The documented reduction in overfishing from historical levels to 4 percent of managed stocks demonstrates the Act's effectiveness in achieving its dual mandate of conservation and sustainable utilization.

Key Points

  • $319 billion in sales impacts from fishery resources
  • Support for 2.1 million jobs in fishing and related industries
  • 19.1 pounds per capita annual seafood consumption
  • Rebuilding of 52 previously depleted fish stocks
  • Reduction of overfishing to 4 percent of managed stocks

Legal Framework

The concurrent resolution operates within Congress's constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause to regulate interstate and foreign commerce, including fisheries in federal waters. The resolution references the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as the foundational statutory authority governing federal fisheries management, codified at 16 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq. The Act itself represents an exercise of federal supremacy over fishery resources in the exclusive economic zone extending from state waters to 200 nautical miles offshore, establishing federal preemption in this maritime domain while preserving state authority within their traditional three-mile territorial waters. The resolution acknowledges the Act's regulatory framework that operates through regional fishery management councils whose decisions are implemented through federal regulations promulgated by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The concurrent resolution creates no new legal authorities, does not amend existing statutory provisions, and establishes no basis for judicial review. The resolution's recognition of bipartisan reauthorizations reflects the Act's evolution through multiple amendments that have strengthened conservation requirements while maintaining the collaborative federalism approach that balances federal oversight with regional management flexibility and state participation in council decision-making.

Legal References

  • Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.
  • U.S. Constitution, Commerce Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3

Critical Issues

The resolution acknowledges persistent challenges facing fisheries management despite the Act's overall success, including ongoing overfishing affecting 4 percent of managed stocks, fishery disasters resulting from environmental changes and extreme weather events, and illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing by foreign fleets that undermines conservation efforts. The resolution's reference to changing ocean and ecosystem conditions highlights the implementation challenge of adapting management measures to climate change impacts, ocean acidification, and shifting species distributions that may not align with existing management boundaries. While the resolution celebrates the rebuilding of 52 stocks, it implicitly acknowledges that additional stocks remain depleted and require continued management attention. The enforcement of annual catch limits and accountability measures presents ongoing compliance challenges, particularly in mixed-stock fisheries where bycatch of depleted species constrains harvest of healthy stocks. The resolution's emphasis on democratic participation and diverse stakeholder representation in regional councils reflects the inherent tension between conservation mandates and economic interests of fishing communities. The concurrent resolution itself presents no constitutional concerns as a non-binding expression of congressional sentiment, but the underlying Act's federal preemption of state authority in the exclusive economic zone has historically generated federalism debates. The resolution contains no cost implications as it authorizes no expenditures, but the continued implementation of the Act requires substantial federal investment in stock assessments, enforcement, and council operations.

Key Points

  • Persistent overfishing affecting 4 percent of managed stocks
  • Fishery disasters from environmental changes and extreme weather
  • Illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing by foreign fleets
  • Adaptation challenges from changing ocean and ecosystem conditions due to climate change
  • Tension between conservation mandates and economic interests of fishing communities
  • Enforcement complexity in mixed-stock fisheries with bycatch concerns

Where it stands

Current
Natural Resources Committee
Next
Committee decision

Sponsors

3
0
Democratic CaucusRepublican Caucus

History

Apr 16

House

Submitted in House

Apr 16

House

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.