HB2341

Establishing the Health Care Facility Threat Assessment Grant Program; and imposing duties on the Department of Health.

Introduced·3/31/26
Introduced Text

Overview

This legislation establishes the Health Care Facility Threat Assessment Grant Program under the Pennsylvania Department of Health, creating a structured framework for improving security and threat preparedness across health care facilities statewide. The bill's primary objectives are to provide financial assistance to health care facilities for conducting standardized threat and risk assessments, to deploy a contractor-managed assessment platform, and to ensure robust legislative oversight through mandatory reporting. The program addresses a recognized gap in health care facility security infrastructure by creating a grant mechanism that enables facilities — particularly those with limited resources — to access professional threat assessment tools and implement corrective actions. Beyond the grant program itself, the bill encompasses a broader set of health finance provisions including cancer control and prevention, ambulatory surgical center data collection, a Joint Underwriting Association, and entertainment contractor provisions, making it a multi-subject health finance measure with the threat assessment program as a central new initiative.

Key Points

  • Establishes the Health Care Facility Threat Assessment Grant Program within the Department of Health
  • Creates a competitive bidding process for selecting a standardized threat and risk assessment platform contractor
  • Provides grants to health care facilities for threat and risk assessments and corrective actions
  • Mandates annual and final reporting to the Department and key legislative committees
  • Addresses multiple health finance topics including cancer control, ambulatory surgical center data, and the Joint Underwriting Association

Core Provisions

The centerpiece of this legislation is the creation of the Health Care Facility Threat Assessment Grant Program, established under §102-M, which directs the Department of Health to implement and administer the program using appropriated funds exclusively for that purpose per §103-M(a). The Department is required under §103-M(c) to use a competitive bidding process to select a contractor who will provide a standardized threat and risk assessment platform to participating health care facilities. Under §104-M, health care facilities may apply to the Department for grants, and upon approval, the Department must disburse the awarded grant no later than 90 days from the date of application approval per §104-M(d)(1). Health care facilities receiving grants are subject to certification requirements outlined in §105-M. The reporting framework established in §106-M requires the Department to publish an annual report on its publicly accessible website by December 31 of the year following the effective date of the subsection and by December 31 of each subsequent year. The report must document the number and type of participating facilities, grant amounts awarded, utilization of the contractor's assessment platform, summaries of risk assessments conducted, corrective actions initiated, total funds distributed during the preceding calendar year, and an aggregate county-level count of participating facilities. A final report is required upon cessation of the program, defined as the full disbursement of all appropriated funds and termination of grant activity.

Key Points

  • §102-M: Establishes the Health Care Facility Threat Assessment Grant Program
  • §103-M(a): Restricts appropriated funds exclusively to program implementation
  • §103-M(c): Mandates competitive bidding for contractor selection
  • §104-M: Governs health care facility grant applications and 90-day disbursement requirement
  • §105-M: Establishes certification requirements for grant recipients
  • §106-M: Requires annual and final public reporting with submission to legislative committees

Legal References

  • Section 802.1 of the act of July 19, 1979 (P.L.130, No.48), known as the Health Care Facilities Act
  • 62 Pa.C.S. Ch. 5 (relating to source selection and contract formation)
  • 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 (relating to unsworn falsification to authorities)

Implementation

The Department of Health bears primary responsibility for all aspects of program implementation, from contractor procurement through grant disbursement and reporting. The Department must conduct a competitive bidding process consistent with 62 Pa.C.S. Chapter 5 to select a contractor capable of delivering a standardized threat and risk assessment platform. Once a contractor is selected, health care facilities may apply for grants, and the Department is bound by a 90-day disbursement deadline following application approval. Reporting obligations are extensive: the Department must publish annual reports on its public website and simultaneously submit those reports to the chairpersons and minority chairpersons of four legislative committees — the Senate Appropriations Committee, the House Appropriations Committee, the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, and the House Health Committee. This dual-track reporting to both fiscal and policy committees ensures comprehensive legislative oversight. Compliance is reinforced through the certification requirements of §105-M and through the application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904, which subjects false statements in program applications or certifications to criminal liability for unsworn falsification to authorities. The program concludes with a final report upon full disbursement of appropriated funds and termination of all grant activity.

Legal References

  • 62 Pa.C.S. Ch. 5 (relating to source selection and contract formation)
  • 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 (relating to unsworn falsification to authorities)
  • Section 802.1 of the act of July 19, 1979 (P.L.130, No.48), known as the Health Care Facilities Act

Impact

The primary direct beneficiaries of this program are health care facilities across Pennsylvania, particularly smaller or under-resourced facilities that lack the internal capacity to conduct comprehensive threat and risk assessments independently. By subsidizing access to a standardized contractor-managed platform, the program democratizes security infrastructure improvements across the health care sector. The county-level aggregate reporting requirement under §106-M(a)(9) signals a legislative intent to ensure geographic equity in grant distribution and to identify underserved regions. The administrative burden on the Department of Health is significant, encompassing contractor procurement, grant application review, disbursement tracking, and multi-committee annual reporting. Health care facilities that receive grants also bear compliance obligations, including certification requirements and the obligation to conduct and report on risk assessments and corrective actions. The program's sunset is self-executing — it terminates upon full disbursement of appropriated funds and cessation of grant activity — meaning its duration is directly tied to the level of legislative appropriation rather than a fixed calendar date. Expected outcomes include measurable improvements in threat preparedness across participating facilities, documented through the required summaries of risk assessments and corrective actions included in annual reports.

Legal Framework

The constitutional basis for this program is grounded in Section 7(a) of Article VIII of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which governs the appropriation and expenditure of state funds and ensures that money appropriated for the program is used exclusively for its stated purpose — a restriction explicitly codified in §103-M(a). The program operates within the existing statutory framework of the Health Care Facilities Act, specifically referencing Section 802.1 of the act of July 19, 1979 (P.L.130, No.48), which provides the definitional and regulatory foundation for health care facility oversight in Pennsylvania. Contractor procurement must comply with 62 Pa.C.S. Chapter 5, governing source selection and contract formation, ensuring that the competitive bidding process meets established procurement law standards. The criminal enforcement mechanism for false statements in program applications invokes 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904, integrating the program into Pennsylvania's existing criminal code framework for government accountability. The bill does not appear to preempt local law or create new regulatory categories beyond the grant program itself, and no explicit judicial review provisions are included, meaning disputes would be resolved under existing administrative law and procurement challenge procedures.

Legal References

  • Section 7(a) of Article VIII of the Constitution of Pennsylvania
  • Section 802.1 of the act of July 19, 1979 (P.L.130, No.48), known as the Health Care Facilities Act
  • 62 Pa.C.S. Ch. 5 (relating to source selection and contract formation)
  • 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 (relating to unsworn falsification to authorities)

Critical Issues

The most significant implementation challenge is the absence of a specified appropriation amount, meaning the program's scope, duration, and reach are entirely dependent on future legislative funding decisions. Without a defined funding floor, the program could be rendered nominal or ineffective if appropriations are insufficient to serve the full universe of eligible health care facilities. The 90-day disbursement requirement, while protective of applicants, may create administrative strain on the Department if application volumes are high or if contractor procurement delays compress the operational timeline. The reporting framework, while comprehensive, contains an ambiguity in §106-M(a)(1) — the provision references 'a description of the care facilities' without specifying the required level of detail, which could lead to inconsistent or incomplete reporting. The program's self-executing sunset tied to fund disbursement rather than a fixed date creates uncertainty for facilities planning multi-year security improvement initiatives, as the program could terminate before facilities complete corrective actions identified through funded assessments. The reliance on a single contractor for the standardized platform introduces concentration risk — if the contractor fails to perform or the contract is terminated, the entire program infrastructure is disrupted. Finally, the bill does not specify appeal rights for facilities whose grant applications are denied, creating a potential due process gap that could invite litigation.

Where it stands

JUN2Tue
Current
Health Committee
Next
Hearing · today

Sponsors

D
1
3
RRR
Democratic CaucusRepublican Caucus

Calendar

Jun 2

10:00 AM

Health (h) Hearing

History

Mar 31

House

Referred to Health