HJ14

Resolution on Marbury v. Madison

Failed·5/20/25
Introduced Text

Montana HJ14 clarifies that the judicial branch does not have exclusive authority to interpret the constitution and that its decisions are not.

Montana HJ14 addresses the misconception that the judicial branch has exclusive authority to interpret the constitution and that its decisions are binding on other branches. The resolution emphasizes that the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison does not assert such exclusive power. It highlights that each branch of government has a coequal responsibility to interpret and maintain fidelity to the constitutions of the United States and Montana. The resolution directs the Secretary of State to send a copy to various state officials and courts, underscoring the shared duty among branches.

Included in complete analysis

  • Overview
  • Core Provisions
  • Implementation
  • Impact
  • Legal Framework
  • Critical Issues

See what it does, who it affects, and the critical issues in plain language. Free, 30 seconds.

Sponsors

0
1
R
Democratic CaucusRepublican Caucus

Roll Call Votes

45 Yea

RRRRRRRDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

55 Nay

DRDRRRDRDDDDDRDDRRDDDDDDRDDRDDDDDDDRDDDDDDDRDDRRDRRDDRD

Calendar

Feb 14, 2025

8:00 AM

House Judiciary Hearing

History

May 20, 2025

House

(H) Died in Process

Apr 7, 2025

House

(H) Missed Deadline for Revenue Bill Transmittal

Mar 20, 2025

House

(H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading