Minnesota HF936 mandates cost-benefit analysis for proposed administrative rules, prohibits certain rule adoptions, and requires legislative.
Minnesota HF936 amends state statutes to require state agencies to conduct a cost-benefit analysis for proposed administrative rules. The analysis must demonstrate that the total projected benefits of the rule will exceed total projected costs. The bill prohibits the adoption of rules unless the need and reasonableness have been established and net benefits are adequately demonstrated. If a rule is found to be deficient, the agency must correct the defect or submit the rule to the Legislative Coordinating Commission and legislative committees.
Included in complete analysis
- Overview
- Core Provisions
- Implementation
- Impact
- Legal Framework
- Critical Issues
See what it does, who it affects, and the critical issues in plain language. Free, 30 seconds.