Round voting button logo
Amendment

Federal S3179

Halo Act

Introduced on 11/18/25

Sponsors

0
1
R
Democratic CaucusRepublican Caucus

Overview

The Halo Act aims to enhance protection for federal immigration enforcement officers by establishing new criminal penalties for obstructing or interfering with their duties. The bill creates a 25-foot protective zone around officers performing official functions and criminalizes certain behaviors within that zone that are intended to impede, threaten, or harass the officers. This legislation seeks to address concerns about officer safety and operational effectiveness in the context of immigration enforcement activities.

Core Provisions

The bill amends Title 18 of the United States Code by adding a new Section 1522 to Chapter 73. It defines key terms including 'Federal immigration enforcement officer' and 'harass'. The core provision makes it unlawful to approach or remain within 25 feet of a federal immigration officer performing legal duties after receiving a verbal warning, if done with intent to impede, interfere, threaten, or harass the officer. Violations can result in fines and/or imprisonment for up to 5 years. The legislation is set to take effect on November 18, 2025.

Key Points

  • Defines 'Federal immigration enforcement officer' and 'harass'
  • Establishes 25-foot protective zone around officers
  • Criminalizes approaching/remaining within zone after warning if intending to impede, threaten, or harass
  • Sets penalty of up to 5 years imprisonment and/or fines

Legal References

  • Title 18, United States Code, Chapter 73
  • Section 1522 (newly added)

Implementation

The bill does not specify implementation details beyond establishing the criminal offense and associated penalties. Enforcement would likely fall to the Department of Justice and federal prosecutors. The legislation does not outline any specific funding mechanisms, reporting requirements, or compliance measures. Implementation would primarily involve educating federal immigration officers about the new protections and integrating the offense into existing law enforcement and prosecutorial processes.

Impact

The direct beneficiaries of this legislation are federal immigration enforcement officers, who would receive additional legal protections while performing their duties. The bill may have a deterrent effect on individuals who might otherwise attempt to interfere with immigration enforcement activities. However, it could also impact the rights of protesters, bystanders, or others who may come into proximity with immigration officers. The administrative burden would primarily fall on law enforcement agencies and the court system in enforcing and adjudicating the new offense. No specific cost estimates or sunset provisions are provided in the available information.

Legal Framework

The bill operates within the federal government's authority to regulate immigration enforcement and protect federal officers. It amends Title 18 of the United States Code, which covers federal crimes and criminal procedure. The legislation may raise constitutional questions related to First Amendment rights of free speech and assembly, as it restricts certain behaviors in proximity to federal officers. The bill does not explicitly address preemption of state or local laws or provide for specific judicial review provisions beyond what would typically apply to federal criminal statutes.

Critical Issues

Several critical issues arise from this legislation. First, there are significant constitutional concerns regarding potential infringement on First Amendment rights, particularly freedom of speech and the right to peaceably assemble. The 25-foot restriction could be challenged as overly broad or vague. Implementation challenges may include difficulties in proving intent to impede, threaten, or harass, as well as consistently enforcing the 25-foot boundary in dynamic situations. The bill could face opposition from civil liberties groups and immigrant advocacy organizations who may view it as an attempt to shield immigration enforcement from public scrutiny or protest. Additionally, there may be unintended consequences such as escalating tensions between immigration officers and communities, or creating situations where individuals unknowingly violate the law by coming too close to officers in public spaces.

Last Action 11/25/25
Halo Act | Amendment