H.R.9260

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027 Department of Labor Appropriations Act, 2027 Department of Health and Human Services Appropriations Act, 2027 Department of Education Appropriations Act, 2027

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

Introduced·6/11/26

Overview

This legislation is the annual appropriations act funding the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for fiscal year 2027, covering the period ending September 30, 2027. The bill allocates hundreds of billions of dollars across a vast array of federal programs spanning healthcare, education, labor, and social services. Beyond its funding function, the bill establishes numerous policy riders that prohibit or restrict the use of appropriated funds for specific purposes, reflecting the majority's policy priorities. The bill covers Medicare and Medicaid administration, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Social Security Administration, federal education programs, workforce development, and national community service, among many other areas. It also addresses strategic preparedness and response, including funding for medical countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats. The legislation represents one of the largest annual spending bills in the federal government and sets the operational parameters for the three named departments and their related agencies for the entire fiscal year.

Key Points

  • Funds the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education for FY2027
  • Allocates appropriations for Medicare, Medicaid, NIH, CDC, SSA, and federal education programs
  • Establishes policy riders restricting use of funds for COVID-19 mandates, abortion, DEI initiatives, and Critical Race Theory
  • Provides funding for strategic preparedness, workforce development, and national community service
  • Sets reporting, compliance, and oversight requirements across all funded agencies

Legal References

  • Public Health Service Act
  • Social Security Act
  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
  • Higher Education Act of 1965
  • Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
  • Rehabilitation Act of 1973
  • Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
  • Immigration and Nationality Act
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
  • Labor-Management Relations Act, 1947

Core Provisions

The bill's most significant funding allocation is for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which receives $468,678,021,000 for program operations, with an additional authority for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to transfer up to $455,000,000 from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund for Medicare program management activities [§240]. The National Institutes of Health receives extensive funding across its institutes and centers, including $2,866,925,000 for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, $2,757,627,000 for human genome research, $2,348,721,000 for diabetes and digestive and kidney disease research, $2,189,843,000 for mental health research, $1,662,695,000 for drug abuse research, $954,323,000 for translational sciences, $913,979,000 for environmental health sciences, $685,465,000 for arthritis and musculoskeletal and skin diseases, $663,200,000 for biomedical imaging and bioengineering, $595,318,000 for alcohol abuse and alcoholism research, $534,333,000 for the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, $440,627,000 for complementary and integrative health, $355,000,000 for NIH facilities construction and renovation, and $197,693,000 for nursing research. The bill also appropriates $1,500,000,000 for advanced research projects for health and $1,060,000,000 for advanced research and development through BARDA, which is also authorized to enter into multi-year contracts of up to 10 program years for research services or security countermeasures [§217]. For education, the bill provides $16,790,647,000 for general education programs, $5,036,746,000 for basic grants under section 1124 of the ESEA, $4,772,906,000 under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, $2,855,010,000 for the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, $2,601,912,000 for WIOA and the National Apprenticeship Act, $529,556,000 for higher education programs under part B of title III and section 723 of the HEA, and $243,643,000 for Safe Schools and Citizenship Education. The Social Security Administration receives $14,692,978,000 for necessary expenses, $2,397,000,000 for continuing disability reviews, and $969,000,000 for program integrity and management. The bill appropriates $3,312,991,000 for research, development, storage, production, and procurement of medical countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats to civilian populations. The bill contains numerous policy riders of significant consequence. Section 539 prohibits the use of any appropriated funds to establish, implement, administer, or enforce COVID-19 mask or vaccine mandates. Section 506 prohibits the use of funds for abortion services. Section 535 prohibits the use of funds for diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, training, programs, offices, officers, policies, or activities that promote or advance Critical Race Theory or associated concepts. Section 249 prohibits the use of funds for research on vertebrate animals to study the effects of drugs, surgery, or other interventions to alter the human body. Section 243 prohibits the use of funds for certain social, psychological, behavioral, or medical interventions. Section 536 prohibits the use of funds for programs or activities that teach or train ideas condoning discrimination based on race or sex. Section 509 prohibits the use of funds for supervised drug consumption facilities and for activities that promote the legalization of certain controlled substances. Section 533 prohibits discrimination based on sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions. Section 537 requires institutions of higher education to adopt prohibitions on antisemitic conduct as a condition of receiving funds. Section 316 prohibits the use of funds to implement, administer, or enforce certain regulations related to borrower defense to repayment. Section 541 limits procurement of computers, printers, or interoperable videoconferencing services from entities with ties to the People's Republic of China. Section 112 prohibits providing funds to any public institution of higher education that denies rights, benefits, or privileges to religious student organizations that are otherwise afforded to other student organizations.

Key Points

  • $468,678,021,000 for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
  • $3,312,991,000 for medical countermeasures against CBRN threats
  • $2,397,000,000 for Social Security continuing disability reviews
  • $1,700,000,000 for grants to States under section 2002 of the Social Security Act
  • $1,681,441,000 for the vaccine injury compensation program trust fund
  • $1,500,000,000 for advanced health research projects
  • $1,060,000,000 for BARDA advanced research and development
  • $385,500,000 for Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics grants
  • $311,200,000 for carrying out titles II, III, and XVII of the PHS Act
  • $204,009,000 for Substance Abuse Prevention
  • $12,366,820,000 for Head Start Act payments
  • Prohibition on COVID-19 mask or vaccine mandates [§539]
  • Prohibition on abortion services funding [§506]
  • Prohibition on DEI and Critical Race Theory programs [§535]
  • Prohibition on supervised drug consumption facilities [§509]
  • Rescission of $162,000,000 in unobligated American Rescue Plan Act balances

Legal References

  • Public Health Service Act §§ 301, 404I, 404L, 751
  • Social Security Act §§ 2002, 2104(n)(2), 658O(a)
  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 §1124
  • Higher Education Act of 1965 §§ 723, part B of title III
  • Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act §§ 168(b), 169(c), 170
  • Rehabilitation Act of 1973
  • American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
  • Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115-31)
  • Homeland Security Act of 2002
  • National Child Protection Act of 1993
  • HIRE Vets Act
  • Education of the Deaf Act of 1986
  • 38 U.S.C. §§ 4109, 4113
  • 10 U.S.C. § 1144
  • 34 C.F.R. § 668.28

Implementation

Implementation responsibility is distributed across the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, along with numerous related agencies including the Social Security Administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, the Corporation for National and Community Service, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the National Labor Relations Board, the Office of Inspector General, and the Administration for Children and Families. The Office of Inspector General receives $32,000,000 for oversight activities, with an additional $5,000,000 transferred to it for oversight of grants, reflecting a strong emphasis on accountability. The bill establishes extensive reporting requirements. The Secretaries of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education must prepare and submit reports on contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements exceeding $500,000 [§517]. The Secretary of Homeland Security must submit a report on children separated from their parents or legal guardians by DHS within 14 days of enactment and monthly thereafter, with public online availability [§233]. Agencies must provide quarterly reports on balances of appropriations. The Secretary of Health and Human Services must submit detailed monthly enrollment figures from the Exchanges [§225] and notify Congress of new or competitive grant awards [§225]. Federal agencies funded under the Act must clearly state that communications are printed, published, or produced at United States taxpayer expense [§522]. The Corporation for National and Community Service may make significant changes to program requirements, service delivery, or policy only through public notice and comment rulemaking [§401]. Funding mechanisms include direct appropriations, trust fund transfers, and contingency funds. The Secretary of HHS may transfer up to $455,000,000 from Medicare trust funds for program management [§240]. The Secretary may reserve up to 0.75 percent from each appropriation for program evaluations [§107]. The Secretary may also dispose of or divest certain real property, including the Treasure Island Job Corps Center and the Gary Job Corps Center, with net proceeds transferred to the Job Corps Program [§113]. BARDA is authorized to enter into contracts for up to 10 program years for research services or security countermeasures [§217]. Grant recipients under section 4303 may reserve up to 10 percent of funds for activities under section 4303(b)(2) [§116]. The bill also limits administrative expenses and salary and bonuses for individuals paid with Employment and Training Administration funds [§105].

Key Points

  • Monthly DHS reporting on separated children, publicly available online [§233]
  • Quarterly appropriations balance reports from funded agencies
  • Secretary may reserve 0.75% of each appropriation for program evaluation [§107]
  • CNCS limited to notice-and-comment rulemaking for significant program changes [§401]
  • Federal communications must identify taxpayer funding source [§522]
  • OIG receives $32,000,000 plus $5,000,000 transfer for grant oversight
  • Congressional notification required 15 days before any transfer or reprogramming
  • Reporting required for grants under §108

Legal References

  • Public Health Service Act §§ 404I, 404L, 751
  • Social Security Act § 2002
  • Executive Order 13589
  • Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985
  • Children's Internet Protection Act
  • Homeland Security Act of 2002
  • Civil Service Reform Act
  • Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
  • Occupational Safety and Health Act

Impact

The bill's direct beneficiaries span virtually every segment of American society. Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries are the largest single group, with over $468 billion directed to CMS program operations. Social Security recipients benefit from $14.7 billion in administrative funding and $2.4 billion for continuing disability reviews. Students at all levels benefit from over $16.7 billion in education program funding, including Title I grants for disadvantaged students, special education funding under IDEA, and higher education support. Workers benefit from $235,000,000 for the Wage and Hour Division, $48,515,000 for the Office of Labor-Management Standards, and $43,000,000 for the Office of Disability Employment Policy. The research community benefits from billions in NIH funding across all major disease areas and scientific disciplines. Communities benefit from $385,500,000 for Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics, $1,060,184,000 for maternal and child health programs, $873,199,000 for chronic disease prevention, $815,872,000 for emerging and zoonotic infectious disease programs, and $663,843,000 for the Global HIV/AIDS Program. The policy riders carry significant impact on specific populations and institutions. The prohibition on DEI programs and Critical Race Theory [§535] will affect federal contractors, grantees, and educational institutions that have built compliance infrastructure around such programs. The prohibition on COVID-19 mandates [§539] affects federal agencies and grant recipients that might otherwise impose such requirements. The prohibition on abortion services funding [§506] continues longstanding restrictions affecting healthcare providers. The requirement that institutions of higher education adopt antisemitism prohibitions [§537] as a condition of funding creates new compliance obligations for colleges and universities. The prohibition on funding public universities that deny rights to religious student organizations [§112] similarly creates new conditions on federal education funding. The rescission of $162,000,000 in unobligated American Rescue Plan Act balances reduces previously available emergency funding. The $12,330,000,000 limitation on the Child Enrollment Contingency Fund restricts availability of those funds in the current fiscal year.

Key Points

  • Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries: primary beneficiaries of $468+ billion in CMS funding
  • NIH research community: billions in funding across all major disease and scientific areas
  • K-12 students: $5+ billion in Title I grants and additional education program funding
  • Disabled individuals: $4.7 billion under Rehabilitation Act and $43 million for disability employment
  • Community behavioral health patients: $385.5 million for Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics
  • Institutions of higher education: new compliance obligations for antisemitism prohibitions and religious student organization rights
  • Federal contractors and grantees: prohibition on DEI and CRT programs affects existing compliance structures
  • Healthcare providers: continued prohibition on abortion services funding

Legal References

  • American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  • Child Care and Development Block Grant Act (CCDBG Act) § 658O(a)
  • Social Security Act § 2104(n)(2)
  • Higher Education Act of 1965
  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965

Legal Framework

The bill rests on Congress's Article I spending power, which grants broad authority to appropriate funds and attach conditions on their use. The numerous policy riders are exercises of this conditional spending authority, under which Congress may restrict how appropriated funds are used even when the underlying activity might otherwise be permissible. The prohibition on abortion services [§506] continues the longstanding Hyde Amendment framework, which has been repeatedly upheld by federal courts as a valid exercise of the spending power. The prohibition on DEI and Critical Race Theory programs [§535] and the prohibition on programs teaching ideas condoning discrimination based on race or sex [§536] raise First Amendment concerns regarding compelled speech and viewpoint discrimination, though courts have generally upheld spending conditions that restrict the use of federal funds rather than private speech. The requirement that institutions of higher education adopt antisemitism prohibitions [§537] implicates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and existing Department of Education enforcement frameworks. The prohibition on funding universities that deny rights to religious student organizations [§112] reflects the Supreme Court's holdings in cases such as Christian Legal Society v. Martinez and related precedents regarding the intersection of free exercise, free speech, and equal access on university campuses. The prohibition on certain social, psychological, behavioral, or medical interventions [§243] and the prohibition on research on vertebrate animals for the purpose of studying interventions to alter the human body [§249] reflect policy judgments about gender-affirming care and related research, areas of active litigation in federal courts. The BARDA multi-year contracting authority [§217] operates under the Public Health Service Act's existing framework for biodefense procurement. The transfer authority for Medicare trust funds [§240] operates within the Social Security Act's established trust fund structure.

Key Points

  • Constitutional basis: Article I spending power and conditional spending doctrine
  • Hyde Amendment framework governs abortion funding prohibition [§506]
  • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 relevant to antisemitism provisions [§537]
  • First Amendment free speech and free exercise implications for DEI and religious organization provisions
  • Social Security Act trust fund structure governs Medicare transfer authority [§240]
  • PHS Act framework governs BARDA contracting authority [§217]
  • Administrative Procedure Act governs CNCS rulemaking requirements [§401]

Legal References

  • U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 9
  • Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI
  • Public Health Service Act
  • Social Security Act
  • Administrative Procedure Act
  • Higher Education Act of 1965
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  • Labor-Management Relations Act, 1947
  • Immigration and Nationality Act
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
  • Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985
  • Howard University Endowment Act
  • 21st Century Cures Act
  • SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act
  • Family Violence Prevention and Services Act
  • Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act
  • National Child Protection Act of 1993
  • Railroad Retirement Act of 1974

Critical Issues

The most significant constitutional concerns arise from the policy riders targeting DEI programs, Critical Race Theory, and gender-related interventions. The prohibition on DEI and CRT programs [§535] and the prohibition on teaching ideas condoning discrimination based on race or sex [§536] are likely to face First Amendment challenges on grounds of viewpoint discrimination and compelled speech, particularly as applied to academic institutions. Courts have distinguished between conditions on the use of federal funds and conditions that effectively regulate private speech, and the breadth of these prohibitions may cross that line. The prohibition on certain social, psychological, behavioral, or medical interventions [§243] and the prohibition on research on vertebrate animals for studying interventions to alter the human body [§249] are directly implicated in ongoing litigation over gender-affirming care restrictions and will face challenges under equal protection and substantive due process theories. Implementation challenges are substantial. The prohibition on DEI programs lacks precise definitional boundaries, creating uncertainty for thousands of federal grantees and contractors about what activities are prohibited. The antisemitism requirement for institutions of higher education [§537] does not specify a definition of antisemitism or a compliance mechanism, leaving implementation details unresolved. The prohibition on procurement from entities with ties to the People's Republic of China [§541] requires supply chain due diligence that many smaller grantees lack the capacity to perform. The coordination required among the Departments of Labor, HHS, and Education, along with dozens of related agencies, creates significant administrative complexity. The limitation on the Child Enrollment Contingency Fund by $12,330,000,000 could constrain states' ability to respond to enrollment surges in the Children's Health Insurance Program. The rescission of American Rescue Plan Act funds may disrupt programs that had planned expenditures against those balances. Opposition arguments center on the policy riders as ideologically motivated restrictions that undermine evidence-based public health and education policy, the inadequacy of funding levels for key programs relative to inflation and demand, and the use of appropriations legislation to make substantive policy changes that bypass the normal legislative process.

Key Points

  • First Amendment challenges likely against DEI/CRT prohibitions [§§535, 536] for viewpoint discrimination
  • Equal protection and due process challenges to gender intervention prohibitions [§§243, 249]
  • Definitional ambiguity in DEI prohibition creates compliance uncertainty for grantees
  • Antisemitism requirement [§537] lacks specified definition or compliance mechanism
  • China procurement restriction [§541] imposes supply chain due diligence burden on smaller grantees
  • $12,330,000,000 CHIP contingency fund limitation may constrain state responses to enrollment surges
  • Rescission of American Rescue Plan Act funds disrupts planned program expenditures
  • Multi-agency coordination complexity across Departments of Labor, HHS, and Education
  • Policy riders use appropriations process to make substantive law changes bypassing normal legislative procedures
  • Abortion-related provisions in Medicare Advantage context [§209] may face ACA preemption arguments

Legal References

  • U.S. Constitution, Amendment I
  • U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV
  • Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
  • American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
  • Social Security Act § 2104(n)(2)
  • Administrative Procedure Act
  • Higher Education Act of 1965

Where it stands

Current
In committee
Next
Committee decision

Sponsors

0
1
Democratic CaucusRepublican Caucus

History

Jun 11

House

The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-696, by Mr. Aderholt.

Jun 11

House

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 604.