Round voting button logo
Amendment

Federal S3386

Health Care Freedom for Patients Act of 2025

Introduced on 12/8/25

Overview

The Health Care Freedom for Patients Act of 2025 represents a comprehensive restructuring of federal healthcare policy with three primary objectives: establishing a new Health Savings Account contribution program for individual market insurance purchasers, restricting federal funding for gender transition medical procedures, and tightening citizenship and immigration status verification requirements for Medicaid and CHIP eligibility. The legislation fundamentally redefines the scope of essential health benefits under the Affordable Care Act while creating a federally-funded HSA program designed to reduce healthcare costs through consumer-directed healthcare mechanisms. The bill imposes strict biological definitions of sex and comprehensively restricts coverage of gender-affirming medical procedures across federal healthcare programs. Additionally, it establishes new barriers to healthcare access for immigrants by requiring verified citizenship or immigration status before federal financial participation in Medicaid and CHIP programs can occur.

Legal References

  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Internal Revenue Code of 1986
  • Social Security Act
  • Immigration and Nationality Act

Core Provisions

The legislation creates an Exchange plan HSA program under Section 223 of the Internal Revenue Code, providing age-tiered federal contributions of $1,000 annually for individuals aged 18-49 and $1,500 for those aged 50-64 who purchase bronze level qualified health plans or catastrophic plans through ACA exchanges. The program applies to plan years beginning after January 1, 2027, with $10 billion appropriated for each of fiscal years 2026 and 2027, available through September 30, 2028. Section 301 amends the ACA to exclude gender transition procedures from essential health benefits in exchange plans, while Section 302 prohibits federal financial participation in Medicaid and CHIP for coverage of specified gender transition procedures. The bill defines gender transition procedures comprehensively to include surgical interventions such as castration, sterilization, hysterectomy, and mastectomy when performed to alter primary or secondary sexual characteristics, as well as hormone treatments and cosmetic procedures. Section 202 restricts federal Medicaid and CHIP funding for individuals without verified citizenship or immigration status, though states retain the option to continue medical assistance during verification periods. The legislation establishes strict binary definitions of biological sex based on reproductive system capabilities, defining male and female exclusively by reference to gamete production capacity.

Key Points

  • Exchange plan HSA contributions: $1,000 for ages 18-49, $1,500 for ages 50-64
  • Eligibility limited to individuals with social security numbers and verified immigration status
  • Income threshold set at 700% of federal poverty line
  • Exclusion of gender transition procedures from essential health benefits under ACA Section 1302
  • Prohibition on federal Medicaid/CHIP funding for gender transition procedures
  • Citizenship and immigration status verification required for federal healthcare funding
  • Implementation date: January 1, 2027 for plan years
  • Funding period: Fiscal Years 2026-2027 with $20 billion total appropriation

Legal References

  • Internal Revenue Code § 223 (Health Savings Accounts)
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act § 1301 (Qualified Health Plan)
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act § 1302 (Essential Health Benefits)
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act § 1402 (Cost-Sharing Reductions)
  • Social Security Act § 1902 (State Medicaid Plans)
  • Social Security Act § 2105 (CHIP)
  • 42 U.S.C. § 1396b (Federal Financial Participation)

Implementation

The Department of Health and Human Services serves as the primary implementing agency, with the Secretary responsible for administering the Exchange plan HSA contribution program and establishing verification procedures for citizenship and immigration status. Health insurance exchanges must report participant information to facilitate HSA contributions, which are to be made as early as possible after eligibility determination. The Internal Revenue Service administers the tax treatment of HSA contributions, which are excluded from gross income. Enrollees must provide social security numbers and, if applicable, attestations of alien status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services enforces restrictions on federal financial participation for Medicaid and CHIP, requiring states to verify citizenship and immigration status before receiving federal matching funds. Funding flows directly from Treasury appropriations to individual HSA accounts for eligible enrollees. The legislation does not establish explicit reporting requirements for compliance monitoring or enforcement mechanisms for the gender transition procedure restrictions beyond the denial of federal financial participation.

Key Points

  • HHS Secretary administers Exchange plan HSA contribution program
  • Health insurance exchanges report participant eligibility information
  • IRS manages tax treatment of HSA contributions
  • CMS enforces federal financial participation restrictions for Medicaid/CHIP
  • States must verify citizenship/immigration status for federal funding eligibility
  • Treasury provides direct appropriations to HSA accounts
  • Payments processed as early as possible after eligibility determination

Legal References

  • Internal Revenue Code of 1986
  • Immigration and Nationality Act
  • 42 U.S.C. § 1396b (Federal Medical Assistance Percentage)

Impact

The legislation directly benefits individuals aged 18-64 who purchase bronze level or catastrophic health plans through ACA exchanges and meet citizenship or immigration status requirements, providing them with federal HSA contributions totaling between $1,000 and $1,500 annually. The $20 billion appropriation over two fiscal years represents substantial federal investment in consumer-directed healthcare. However, the bill significantly restricts healthcare access for transgender individuals by eliminating coverage for gender-affirming medical procedures across federal programs, affecting both exchange plans and Medicaid/CHIP beneficiaries. Immigrants face new barriers to healthcare access through citizenship verification requirements, potentially delaying or denying medical assistance during verification periods. The administrative burden on states increases substantially through new verification requirements for Medicaid and CHIP eligibility. Health insurance exchanges face additional reporting obligations and must modify plan offerings to exclude gender transition procedures from essential health benefits. The legislation creates narrow exceptions for medical procedures related to precocious puberty, medically verified disorders of sex development, and specific chromosomal conditions, but these exceptions require parental consent for minors. The funding mechanism includes a sunset provision with appropriations available only through September 30, 2028, creating uncertainty about program continuation beyond that date.

Key Points

  • Beneficiaries: Individuals aged 18-64 purchasing bronze/catastrophic plans through exchanges
  • Cost: $20 billion total appropriation for fiscal years 2026-2027
  • Restrictions affect transgender individuals seeking gender-affirming care
  • Immigrants face delayed or denied healthcare access during verification
  • States incur increased administrative costs for verification processes
  • Health insurance exchanges must modify plan structures and reporting
  • Funding available through September 30, 2028
  • Narrow medical exceptions require parental consent for minors

Legal Framework

The legislation operates under Congress's constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce and its spending power to condition federal funding on state compliance with federal requirements. The bill amends multiple foundational healthcare statutes including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Social Security Act governing Medicaid and CHIP, and the Internal Revenue Code establishing HSA rules. The statutory framework creates federal preemption of state laws that would require coverage of gender transition procedures as essential health benefits in exchange plans or mandate such coverage in Medicaid programs receiving federal financial participation. States retain limited flexibility to continue medical assistance during citizenship verification periods using state-only funds, but federal matching funds remain unavailable until verification occurs. The legislation does not explicitly provide for judicial review, though affected individuals and states may challenge the law's constitutionality and implementation through standard Administrative Procedure Act mechanisms. The strict binary definition of biological sex and comprehensive restrictions on gender-affirming medical procedures create potential conflicts with existing anti-discrimination laws and constitutional equal protection principles. The citizenship verification requirements interact with existing immigration law frameworks under the Immigration and Nationality Act, creating new eligibility barriers that may face legal challenges under due process grounds.

Legal References

  • U.S. Constitution, Commerce Clause (Art. I, § 8, cl. 3)
  • U.S. Constitution, Spending Clause (Art. I, § 8, cl. 1)
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. § 18001 et seq.)
  • Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.)
  • Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C.)
  • Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq.)
  • Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.)

Critical Issues

The legislation faces substantial constitutional challenges on multiple grounds. The strict binary definition of biological sex and comprehensive exclusion of gender transition procedures from federal healthcare programs raise equal protection concerns under the Fifth Amendment, particularly given evolving judicial recognition of transgender individuals as a protected class. The citizenship verification requirements may violate due process rights by denying healthcare access during verification periods, potentially affecting lawfully present individuals and creating life-threatening delays in medical care. Implementation challenges include the administrative complexity of verifying citizenship and immigration status across millions of Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries, imposing significant costs on state agencies already facing resource constraints. The narrow medical exceptions for gender transition procedures create ambiguity in clinical practice, as providers must determine whether procedures qualify under exceptions for disorders of sex development or chromosomal conditions, potentially leading to inconsistent application and litigation. The $20 billion cost estimate may prove insufficient given uncertain enrollment projections and the potential for adverse selection if healthier individuals disproportionately benefit from HSA contributions. The legislation creates perverse incentives by encouraging individuals to purchase minimal coverage bronze or catastrophic plans to access HSA contributions rather than more comprehensive coverage. Unintended consequences include potential increases in uncompensated care costs as immigrants lose Medicaid eligibility, shifting financial burdens to safety-net providers and state budgets. The sunset of appropriations in 2028 creates program instability and may strand beneficiaries who rely on HSA contributions for healthcare financing. Opposition arguments center on discrimination against transgender individuals, barriers to immigrant healthcare access, federal overreach into medical practice decisions, and the potential for increased healthcare costs through emergency room utilization by individuals denied preventive and routine care.

Key Points

  • Equal protection challenges to gender transition procedure restrictions
  • Due process concerns regarding citizenship verification delays
  • Administrative burden on states for verification processes
  • Clinical ambiguity in applying narrow medical exceptions
  • Potential cost overruns beyond $20 billion appropriation
  • Adverse selection risks in insurance markets
  • Increased uncompensated care costs for safety-net providers
  • Program instability from 2028 funding sunset
  • Discrimination concerns affecting transgender individuals
  • Federal intrusion into state healthcare policy and medical practice

Legal References

  • U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment (Due Process and Equal Protection)
  • Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706) (Judicial Review)

Sponsors

0
2
RR
Democratic CaucusRepublican Caucus

Roll Call Votes

On the Cloture Motion S. 3386 RC# 643

51 Yea

RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

48 Nay

DDDDDIDIDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDRDDDDDDDDDD

1 Absent

R
Health Care Freedom for Patients Act of 2025 | Amendment